![]() The company describes it as a nutrition label: information for digital content that stays with the file wherever it’s published or stored. In order to reduce confusion between fake and real images, the content authenticity initiative group developed a tool Adobe is now using called content credentials that tracks when images are edited by AI. “And that starts with knowing what something is and, in cases where it makes sense, who made it or where it came from.” “We all have a fundamental right to establish a common objective reality,” said Andy Parsons, senior director of Adobe’s content authenticity initiative group. OpenAI’s popular image generation technology DALL-E already adds a colorful stripe watermark to the bottom of all images it creates. Google, for example, said at its recent I/O conference that, in the coming months, it will attach a written disclosure, similar to a copyright notice, underneath AI-generated results on Google Images. Companies like Google, Adobe, and Microsoft are all supporting some form of labeling of AI in their products. One novel approach - that some experts say could actually work - is to use metadata, watermarks, and other technical systems to distinguish fake from real. “We all have a fundamental right to establish a common objective reality” So what, if anything, should the tech companies that are rapidly developing AI be doing to prevent their tools from being used to bombard the internet with hyperrealistic misinformation? “Now we’re going to see the other end of this equation.” “We already saw what happened in 2016 when we had the first election with a flooding of disinformation,” said Joshua Tucker, a professor and co-director of NYU’s Center for Social Media and Politics. The anti-misinformation platform NewsGuard started tracking such sites and found nearly three times as many as they did a few weeks prior. Already, spammy news sites seemingly generated entirely by AI are popping up. One report by Europol, the European Union’s law enforcement agency, predicted that as much as 90 percent of content on the internet could be created or edited by AI by 2026. Experts say we can expect to see more fake images like the Pentagon one, especially when they can cause political disruption. But recently, tools like ChatGPT, DALL-E, Midjourney, and even new AI feature updates to Photoshop have supercharged the issue by making it easier and cheaper to create hyperrealistic fake images, video, and text, at scale. Online misinformation has existed since the dawn of the internet, and crudely photoshopped images fooled people long before generative AI became mainstream. But in the short amount of time it circulated, the fake image had a real impact and even briefly moved financial markets. ![]() The photo was quickly determined to be a hoax, likely generated by AI. Reporters asked government officials all the way up to the White House press office what was going on. Within a matter of minutes of being posted, the realistic-looking image spread on Twitter and other social media networks after being retweeted by some popular accounts. Literally did 'American Flag' and it was like, 'Nah we need someone to review this'."Īt least we can say Bing is cracking down on untoward use of its generator, though I imagine artists won't be too happy regarding the report-to-limit policy.On May 22, a fake photo of an explosion at the Pentagon caused chaos online. User x246ab also commented "I have legitimately been unable to get it to produce a single image for me. One Reddit post by user ClinicalIllusionist popped up recently, entitled "Just got access to Bing’s Image Creator and already got banned for trying to generate an image of 'an excited Redditor trying Bing’s new Image Creator'." That doesn't seem too risqué to me, but I suppose that depends on the generator's representation of "an excited Redditor". It seems the community isn't happy with the strictness of the regulation, though. It does not go into detail about where the reference images are being sourced, though the assumption is that it's scraping from Bing image search.īing is coming down hard on explicit content, however, reeling off all the ways its preventing exploitative images, gore, and the like from being generated. ![]() "We will allow living artists to report their name to us for limiting the creation of images associated with their names." Best CPU for gaming: The top chips from Intel and AMDīest gaming motherboard: The right boardsīest graphics card: Your perfect pixel-pusher awaitsīest SSD for gaming: Get into the game ahead of the rest
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |